Digital Media Center
Bryant-Denny Stadium, Gate 61
Box 870370
920 Paul Bryant Drive
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0370
205-348-6644

© 2026 Alabama Public Radio
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Free performance tickets! Sponsored by our partners. Click here to see active APR Giveaways.

Alabama U.S. House members vote along party lines on Ukraine aid bill

Ukrainian soldiers shout "Glory to Ukraine", after returning from captivity after a POWs exchange between Russia and Ukraine, in Chernyhiv region, Ukraine, on Friday, June 5, 2026. (AP Photo/Evgeniy Maloletka)
Evgeniy Maloletka/AP Photo/Evgeniy Maloletka
/
AP
Ukrainian soldiers shout "Glory to Ukraine", after returning from captivity after a POWs exchange between Russia and Ukraine, in Chernyhiv region, Ukraine, on Friday, June 5, 2026. (AP Photo/Evgeniy Maloletka)

The House passed legislation that would aid Ukraine and sanction key segments of the Russian economy, overriding objections from Republican leaders who warned the bill would undermine negotiations designed to achieve a comparable but stronger result. The legislation, sponsored by Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y., seeks to cement U.S. assistance for Ukraine by providing more than $1 billion in security and reconstruction aid. It would make another $8 billion available for Ukraine's defense through loans.

The website of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives says Alabama’s delegation voted along party lines on the measure. Republican House members Robert Aderholt, Barry Moore, Mike Rogers, Gary Palmer, and Dale Strong cast ballots against the bill. Democrats Terri Sewell and Shomari Figures supported it.

The 226-195 vote is a sign of impatience with President Donald Trump's approach to the war and represents the House's second major foreign policy break with Trump this week. The day before, the House, for the first time, approved a war powers resolution aimed at halting U.S. military action against Iran.

Tuscaloosa U.S. military veteran Alex Drueke was a guest on “APR Notebook” for an interview that recorded before the Congressional vote. He made international headlines when he volunteered to fight for the Ukrainian army, and then was captured by Russian forces and spent 105 days as a P.O.W. Drueke says he expected a post-Soviet nation when he first arrived, but that wasn’t he saw.

“I was extremely impressed," Drueke recalled. “I mean, the cities are modern, European, beautiful, the food is delicious, the countryside is gorgeous, and the people were incredible. They are the most kind, most generous people I've ever met. They were able to retain humor even in the face of this horrible situation.”

After Drueke’s captivity, he returned as a free man as part of the defense NGO to see Ukraine’s drone capabilities firsthand. He says that Europe and the U.S. should help Ukraine win the war, and then benefit from the technology the nation has developed during years of fighting against Russia.

“I guarantee you and we, it would be incredibly stupid of us not to partner with Ukrainians get them into NATO and have them teach us how wars are fought,” said Drueke. “Because I guarantee you, Russia is teaching our enemies how these wars are fought. And if we have to go to a war with a peer adversary, we're toast. We don't know what we're doing.”

The link to Alex Drueke’s interview on “APR Notebook” is below.

Supporters of the aid bill, approved in the House, were able to force action on the Ukraine bill by gathering 218 signatures on a discharge petition, a legislative tool that allows a majority of the House to effectively bypass leadership.

Once rarely successful, House members have used the petition tool this Congress to pass bills on releasing the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein and to extend health care subsidies to many of those who get health coverage through the Affordable Care Act, though the latter measure faltered in the Senate.

Meeks said the question before the House was simple. Would it help Ukraine negotiate from a position of strength or help Russia outlast American resolve?

“We all want this war to end,” Meeks said. “The question is how. Will we abandon Ukraine and force it into a terrible deal? That is what Vladimir Putin is counting on. Or will this body live up to the commitments we've made since the start of this war?”

The vast majority of Republicans opposed the measure. Rep. French Hill, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said he is a steadfast supporter of Ukraine. However, the Arkansas Republican said the House was confronted with a flawed, outdated measure that actually calls for less funding for Ukraine security assistance compared to what Congress had agreed to as part of this year's defense policy. Another section could lead to a decrease in defense spending by some NATO members, he warned.

Rep. Brian Mast, the chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, said he believed the bill was “a cudgel to fight against President Trump.”

“This bill, in my opinion, is an unserious bill that was crafted basically a year-and-a-half ago,” Mast, R-Fla., said.

Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., broke with most of his Republican colleagues in voicing support for the measure.

“Are we going to stand with good or are we going to stand with evil? That’s what this is about tonight,” he said.

In the end, 18 Republicans, 207 Democrats and one independent voted for the bill. Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar joined with 194 Republicans in voting against it.

Supporters are hopeful that the House's passage of the Ukraine bill would put pressure on the Senate to do the same. But they also know the Senate likely won’t go along unless Trump endorses the bill.

“It's probably not going to get 60 votes in the Senate, but it's going to hopefully force the Senate to address the issue," said Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., who signed the discharge petition and voted for the bill. “It's going to send a great message to the soldiers of Ukraine.”

He said the vote would also send a message to Putin that “we do have a pulse here, that we do care about Ukraine and that we are going to utilize our authority to help them.”

As the war has dragged on, it's gotten more difficult for supporters of Ukraine in Congress to provide additional financial support to help Ukraine defend itself.

The U.S. has approved some $195 billion for the Ukraine response, according to the latest quarterly inspector general report for Operation Atlantic Resolve, with roughly a quarter of that going to replenish weapons stockpiles for the U.S. military. The last major legislation designed to bolster the Ukraine response occurred in April 2024, though modest amounts have since been included in annual appropriations bills.

Republican leaders urged their members to oppose the legislation. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said there are good-faith negotiations between members of Congress and the White House to boost Ukraine. He described the negotiations as complicated.

“I think they are going to yield positive results, but you set that back if you pass legislation that doesn't go as far as the negotiations are going,” Scalise said.

The war that followed Russia’s full-scale invasion of its neighbor is more than four years old, with no end in sight. In recent days, both sides have sought an edge by launching long-range missile strikes.
U.S.-led peace efforts have fizzled out as the sides made no progress on key differences and after the war in Iran grabbed Washington’s attention. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy accepted an unconditional ceasefire demanded by Trump, but Putin refused.

Action in the Senate on Ukraine has revolved around a bill that would impose sweeping tariffs and secondary sanctions on countries that purchase Russia’s oil, gas, uranium and other exports, which are crucial to financing Russia’s military. But the bill has languished.

Pat Duggins is news director for Alabama Public Radio.
The Associated Press
[Copyright 2024 NPR]
Related Content
  • APR news has covered the war between Ukraine and Russia a lot. When President Joe Biden said, ‘We will walk softly and carry a big javelin,’ he was paraphrasing Teddy Roosevelt and his saying about carrying ‘a big stick.’ Biden was also giving a nod to the Lockheed Martin plant in Troy, that Alabama factory makes the shoulder fired anti-tank missiles. And then there's the perspective of Alex Drueke.
News from Alabama Public Radio is a public service in association with the University of Alabama. We depend on your help to keep our programming on the air and online. Please consider supporting the news you rely on with a donation today. Every contribution, no matter the size, propels our vital coverage. Thank you.